<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When will pixels become obsolete?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kilianvalkhof.com/2008/design/when-will-pixels-become-obsolete/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kilianvalkhof.com/2008/design/when-will-pixels-become-obsolete/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:29:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Hucklesby</title>
		<link>http://kilianvalkhof.com/2008/design/when-will-pixels-become-obsolete/comment-page-1/#comment-9364</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hucklesby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 19:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kilianvalkhof.com/?p=167#comment-9364</guid>
		<description>Personally, I like percentage widths on columns. Pixels for images will likely be around for some time, although you *can* use EMs if the image quality is good.

I advise against using pixels for text, as it is difficult to get IE to enlarge pixel-sized text. Definitely an accessibility problem, Guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I like percentage widths on columns. Pixels for images will likely be around for some time, although you *can* use EMs if the image quality is good.</p>
<p>I advise against using pixels for text, as it is difficult to get IE to enlarge pixel-sized text. Definitely an accessibility problem, Guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://kilianvalkhof.com/2008/design/when-will-pixels-become-obsolete/comment-page-1/#comment-9347</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 03:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kilianvalkhof.com/?p=167#comment-9347</guid>
		<description>Im working on an application right now that is for the most part em based. It&#039;s one of the more complicated apps I have worked on in terms of structure and design meeting accessibility.

It wasn&#039;t until I tried testing the site that I noticed em&#039;s were in fact holding the site back. The issue was that if I had a div padding on the left and right, em&#039;s were causing it to inflate too much. Pixels helped keep things in line and accessible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im working on an application right now that is for the most part em based. It&#8217;s one of the more complicated apps I have worked on in terms of structure and design meeting accessibility.</p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t until I tried testing the site that I noticed em&#8217;s were in fact holding the site back. The issue was that if I had a div padding on the left and right, em&#8217;s were causing it to inflate too much. Pixels helped keep things in line and accessible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://kilianvalkhof.com/2008/design/when-will-pixels-become-obsolete/comment-page-1/#comment-9343</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 01:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kilianvalkhof.com/?p=167#comment-9343</guid>
		<description>As you say, photographs and things present a problem and the proposed solution you refer to I agree, seems like it could be a major headache for web designers. It doesn&#039;t sit right with me for some reason. But the more I think about it now, the more I think it&#039;s probably the best and maybe only feasible solution. I still don&#039;t like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you say, photographs and things present a problem and the proposed solution you refer to I agree, seems like it could be a major headache for web designers. It doesn&#8217;t sit right with me for some reason. But the more I think about it now, the more I think it&#8217;s probably the best and maybe only feasible solution. I still don&#8217;t like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venus Tang&#8217;s portfolio – New Media Designer &#187; Blog Archive &#187; When will pixels become obsolete?</title>
		<link>http://kilianvalkhof.com/2008/design/when-will-pixels-become-obsolete/comment-page-1/#comment-9333</link>
		<dc:creator>Venus Tang&#8217;s portfolio – New Media Designer &#187; Blog Archive &#187; When will pixels become obsolete?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kilianvalkhof.com/?p=167#comment-9333</guid>
		<description>[...] No matter how many EM’s or percentages we use in our design, we are still locked down with pixels ... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] No matter how many EM’s or percentages we use in our design, we are still locked down with pixels &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://kilianvalkhof.com/2008/design/when-will-pixels-become-obsolete/comment-page-1/#comment-9322</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 13:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kilianvalkhof.com/?p=167#comment-9322</guid>
		<description>If pixels disappear, we can only use vector images on websites, snce vector images can be scaled up and down wihout quality loss,  and can&#039;t use bitmap based image editors for making web graphics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If pixels disappear, we can only use vector images on websites, snce vector images can be scaled up and down wihout quality loss,  and can&#8217;t use bitmap based image editors for making web graphics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nacho</title>
		<link>http://kilianvalkhof.com/2008/design/when-will-pixels-become-obsolete/comment-page-1/#comment-9321</link>
		<dc:creator>Nacho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 13:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kilianvalkhof.com/?p=167#comment-9321</guid>
		<description>I think you mean PPI instead of DPI.
I really didn&#039;t know about the different PPI in devices. I thought everything was 72.

I actually think it will never be obsolete. Unless the unit we call pixel dissapears.
Measuring stuff in pixels is not so bad. In some cases we can control stuff better.

At least is what I think.

Nacho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you mean PPI instead of DPI.<br />
I really didn&#8217;t know about the different PPI in devices. I thought everything was 72.</p>
<p>I actually think it will never be obsolete. Unless the unit we call pixel dissapears.<br />
Measuring stuff in pixels is not so bad. In some cases we can control stuff better.</p>
<p>At least is what I think.</p>
<p>Nacho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
