Last week I attended the Future of web apps conference in London. It was my first large conference and I had an absolute blast being there. 1. The 35% accessibility bonus. One of the first presentations was by Robin Christopherson from Abilitynet. They do a lot of interesting research in the accessibility-field of web development. One of…
Welcome the first web art movement!
Everywhere I look, people are bashing the ‘web2.0-look’. They’re bashing it for pretty much every reason possible. I think those people should dive into their art history once more, it would do them good. I’ll help them and you make a jump-start:
Note that I’ve added ‘-look’ to the end of web2.0, this article is about the design part of ‘web 2.0’
Yesterday I saw a BBC documentary on the history of rock. One piece that stood out was this bit: an old man interviewing the original lead singer of Pink Floyd. He asked him “why do you play so loud? I really dislike it, I grew up on string quartets and this is something completely different” to which Syd (presumably drugged) answers with “We like it that way”.
We like it that way.
The end of the 60’s, rock music in all it’s extravaganza was emerging and all the critics hated it. Because of the new sound, but also because rock was carried in on the back of a radical new art movement: Pop art.
Pop art. What does that word do with you? Presumably not much, it’s a pretty common term. Now how about “web 2.0”? does it make you cringe, shudder or feel annoyed? Welcome back to the 60’s, baby! That’s how all the then-contemporary artists reacted to this new, blasphemous movement. They absolutely hated it. Cheap crap with no soul that was copied over and over, and over and over and then some more.
Are you starting to see where I’m getting at yet?
History tells us of quite a lot of art movements, pop art is just one of them that I chose as example. How did you think people reacted to surrealism, dadaism or minimalism? Art movements always have a period of scrutiny, but a couple of years later even the biggest critic calls it art.
Show that we’ve learned from history. Just like our current web2.0 art movement, pop art generated a lot of crap. Does that mean we should throw the baby out with the bathwater? Pop art was synonym with fake for a long time. However: Andy Warhol, Keith Haring, Richard Hamilton, and I could name quite a few more. I doubt you would find anyone now that doesn’t consider their work to be art.
We’re currently full-blown into the first web art movement. Never before have web designers gone so all-out with new techniques, experimenting in all directions but all with a common style. Embrace it, learn from it, grab the opportunity and emerge from it as a better designer.
If we’ve all embraced this radical new art movement in the sixties then we, the open-minded, contemporary web developers of the 21st century, should embrace the first ever web art movement as well: web 2.0!
This site is made with a screw IE attitude …
Last Friday, I attended Anne’s presentation on HTML5 at info.nl. As is usually the case, Murphy jumped in right at the beginning and we couldn’t get the beamer to work. Which Anne didn’t really mind, it turned out ;) . So we looked at the presentation on a nice, large monitor. The meat of the presentation…